It’s hard to see how the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan can keep his job, given his admitted “poor judgment” in publicly airing his misgivings about his dealings with President Obama and members of his administration, while fostering a command climate in which his “profane, irreverent aides” as the Washington Post described them, mocked Vice President Joe Biden.
Here’s what the president said last night: “We will fight this … with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes.” That’s a lot different from the stated strategy for Afghanistan which is more like: “We will fight this with as much as we can spare, for a least another year.”
A U.S. military investigation delivered a scathingly critical assessment: showing not only how screw-ups can get innocent people killed, but also how the U.S. military really does take seriously the investigation of unintended civilian casualties. It does not simply write off the deaths of women, children, and other non-combatants as “collateral damage” –a term that has increasingly taken on an unwarranted pejorative tone, implying that U.S. forces are uncaring and unfeeling about the loss of innocent life.
The more I hear about how much progress is being made in Afghanistan, the more concerned I become about the long-term prospects for success. So I’m looking forward to getting some firsthand insights from my partners at military.com, who are heading to Afghanistan for a clear-eyed assessment of what’s really happening.
President Barack Obama’s six-hour foray into Kabul — arriving at dusk and leaving before dawn — makes one wonder if he’s still in the dark about Afghanistan.
By Jamie McIntyre on Thursday, December 31st, 2009
But what Yemen underscores is that al Qaida no longer needs Afghanistan as a base of operations. It can, and does, operate from any number of countries. In this Internet age, it can be anywhere. So the massive investment in rebuilding Afghanistan provide only the same false sense of security and accomplishment, as did the Maginot line after WW1.
Bob Woodard says the sources (more than one) who leaked him the McChrystal report had “pretty pure” motives and were not trying to “box in” President Obama. He also insists that after the initial anger some in the White House told him the publication “did them a favor.” And that the scoop was in some respects as significant as the landmark Pentagon Papers case in 1971.
A compilation of three clips showing a UH60 Black Hawk landing on a mountaintop in Zabul, Afghanistan, to insert coalition ground forces Nov. 6. Lt. Col. Carey Wagen and co-pilot Chief Warrant Officer Jesse Ashhurst, both members of 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, or Task Force Pegasus.
Iraq: Mission Not-So-Accomplished GEORGE W HAD TO GET SADDAM BECAUSE HIS DADDY DIDN`T.I`LL AGREE THE WORLD IS BETTER OFF WITHOUT SADDAM AND HIS SONS BUT LOOK AT THE AMERICAN LIVES IT... MIKE SPENCER
Iraq: Mission Not-So-Accomplished Got rid of a evil dictator that killed 1,000's of innocent civilians – check Gave Iraq back to the people – check Removed the balance of... Thunder350
Iraq: Mission Not-So-Accomplished Your two closings points are spot-on. I cringe when I read them, having been one of the outspoken skeptics like your "unabashed liberal friend."... Kyle York
WikiLeaks: Whistleblowers or Info-Terrorists? Just what information can harm our national security? Would giving the Russians or the Chinese or the Iraninas or the Venezuelans the... Buddhabafflesbrains
WikiLeaks: Whistleblowers or Info-Terrorists? This isn't all that complicated: – an informed public can make better decisions about those who govern – but not all government... FNAR_308
WikiLeaks: Whistleblowers or Info-Terrorists? Oh please someone give me an example from the last 50 years of when the military has shown that they could handle the duances and context of complex... Curt