Our Man in Pakistan

Our Man in Pakistan

This is a guest post from Pakistani wonder-journalist Ali Chishti.  Ali is a lawyer (LLB in criminal law; his thesis was on Pakistani jihadi networks) who also reports for a range of Pakistani and international publications, including at times Military​.com .  An author of a  political biography of Altaf Hassain and the Muttahida Quami Movement, I’m very pleased to announce that his  Jihadi Godzilla and the Pakistani Intelligence Community is being printed as we speak.
*****
The United States is starting to plan peace negotiations with the Taliban, talks designed to end the fighting in Afghanistan.

How successful these talks will be is an open question.  Bruce Riedel, for example, has said that “it’s a long shot but worth the try.”

While the US and the Taliban edge closer to historic negotiations in Qatar, guerrilla leaders have opened an official office there.  Confidence Building Measures (often shortened to just “CBMs”) have been exchanged by both sides:  Washington seeks the release of U.S. Army soldier Bowe Bergdahl and kidnapped American aid worker Warren Weinstein — both of whom are said to be held at Miranshah, North Waziristan in Pakistan – while the insurgents have asked that five senior Taliban commanders held at Guantanamo Bay go back home.


There might be some complications there.  In Pakistan, doubts remain whether the Taliban in North Waziristan, guerrillas who are closer ideologically to al-Qaeda than some of the Afghan militias, will release the American prisoners if Mullah Omar orders it.

But there’s also talk that Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha, the ISI chief, recently made a “secret trip” to Dubai and Pakistan Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani flew to Qatar to help facilitate talks with the Taliban.

The question now becomes how seriously Barack Obama’s administration is about releasing Mullah Mohammad Fazal , a detainee at Guantanamo Bay.  He would take over the Taliban’s Qatar office, per the request of those in the so-called “Kabul setup.”

One of the closest friends of Mullah Omar, Fazal was tied to a massacre of thousands of Shia Hazaras in September of 1998.  His henchmen left their bodies to rot on the streets of Mazar-i-Sharif, where they were eaten by dogs.   And while the Obama administration is right in  making initiatives to talk to their enemies, they shouldn’t forget the other ethnic parties and parliamentarians in Afghanistan who had fought the Taliban for years and might feel left out, such as the Hazaras who haven’t forgotten Fazal.

There can be no peace without everyone being on board, including Pakistan and the sectarian warlords in Afghanistan.

The Pakistanis who had previously been apprehensive about direct talks between the Taliban and the Americans — and had arrested Mullah Baradar in Karachi in  2010 – have seemed to calm down now that ISI’s Pasha has visited Qatar to confer with U.S. Central Command officials.  His actions suggest that ISI would like to take a rain check on the issue and let Pakistan’s foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Kher,   a leader considered to be close to the ISI, schedule a visit with Kabul.

Pakistani security officials nevertheless would be delighted with Fazal’s homecoming since he had traditionally been “Pro-Pakistan,” according to a senior official.  But he also might become an American trump card because while Fazal is a friend of Pakistan he’s also a diehard enemy of Iran.  The return of a man who helped to kill thousands of Shiites could cause friction between Tehran and Islamabad, to the point that it scuttles the planned Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline.

Afghan boss Hamid Karzai had been opposed to any direct talks between the U.S. and the Taliban.  But now he seems to have quieted down and has been offering conciliatory words in public, even reaching out to other powers with influence in the region.

“Even if the Taliban office is established in Qatar, we will obviously pursue other efforts in the region, including Saudi Arabia and Turkey,” Karzai said.

“Saudi Arabia has played an important role in the past. We value that and look forward to continued support and contact with Saudi Arabia in continuing the peace process,” he added.

While the Taliban  and United States move closer to talks, American leaders should consider all their options but they must never forget Pakistan’s central importance in the decade-long war.  Leaders in Islamabad have for a long time provided safe haven to the Quetta Shura.  To attempt to forge an agreement with the Taliban while disregarding Pakistan will lead only to Islamabad spoiling the game.

The only way to remedy that is to warn Pakistan that any spoiler, any blackmail, could result in the complete breakdown of relations between the two countries.

The talks might begin in Qatar, but peace runs through Pakistan.

Tags: , , , ,

Join the Conversation

As always, an interesting read. Thank you.

The only way to remedy that is to warn Pakistan that any spoiler, any blackmail, could result in the complete breakdown of relations between the two countries.

But there is nobody in Washington that can do this in any meaningful way because no one wants to give up a regional strategic asset. Not anyone with any real say. Not even Congress. It’s madness on the subject of Pakistan policy in DC, a complete free-for-all between various “patrons” of various causes. Look at the ridiculous Baluchistan hearings. Ridiculous, but I understand the frustration (and foolishness) from which such hearings arise. People have learned that the best way to get what you want is to develop a consituency in Washington. That’s the way the game is played and why some get away with everything. This is the incentive structure we Americans have created.(1/2)

The old Northern Alliance types and their regional partners don’t trust the situation and don’t trust any promises that will be made. The old interference will continue, just “sotto voce”. The old groups are rearming, politically and otherwise. How can there be a reconciliation between all sides? Who exactly is renouncing violence if violence is determined as the determination to control the fate of others? At any rate, thank you. I hope against hope that some of this works out and that all players can be brought to the table and disarmed. I don’t realistically see how it will happen, however, because there is no will to do such a thing by anyone with real power.(2/2)

One might be tempted to suggest that India has had a better go of negotiating with Pakistan lately than the U.S. has.

It takes a special talent to make the Americans more hated than the Indians, if polls are correct. Strong work, Washington Consensus!

Pakistan on Tuesday gave an unequivocal assurance to Iran for early implementation of the US$7.6 billion Iran-Pakistan (IP) gas pipeline, a week after the toughest warning issued yet by the United States to Islamabad to shelve the project. http://​atimes​.com/​a​t​i​m​e​s​/​S​o​u​t​h​_​A​s​i​a​/​N​B​0​9​D​f​0​2​.​h​tml

I once joked at Abu Muqawama that the Indians and Chinese would become so disgusted by the Americans in their backyard that they would get together and keep the Americans out of the Indian Ocean. Like, fifty years down the line or something. You never know. Alliances shift. (1/2)

Blogger Pundita is on the right track:
I was sitting on the patio one morning six years ago, enjoying the quiet and early Spring weather, when I heard the most godawful sound. I’d barely blurted, “What the –?” when I learned the sound was a squirrel’s idea of a battle cry issuing from maybe 200 squirrel throats. All the squirrels in the neighborhood, it seemed, had banded together to run off a large rat and the chase was taking them through my back yard. I never saw or heard anything like it my life. And let me tell you that rat was burning rubber. Never saw a rat run so fast. http://​pundita​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​2​/​0​1​/​u​r​g​e​n​t​-​a​d​v​ice…
(2/2)

I wonder if this is true or just a nonsense claim? Wheels within wheels.…

“Now there is an explosive new charge. The former head of the Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) says former president Pervez Musharraf knew bin Laden was in Abbottabad. General Ziauddin Khawaja, also known as Ziauddin Butt, was head of ISI from 1997 to 1999. A four star general, he fought in the 1965 and 1971 wars with India. He was the first head of the army’s Strategic Plans Division which controls the country’s nuclear weapons. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif made him director general of ISI in 1997 and promoted him to chief of army staff on October 12, 1999 when he fired Musharraf from the job. Musharraf refused to go and launched a coup that overthrew Sharif. Ziauddin spent the next two years in solitary confinement, was discharged from the army, had his property confiscated and his retirement benefits curtailed. So he has a motive to speak harshly about Musharraf.” Poor Rick “musharraf” santorum.…
http://​news​.yahoo​.com/​d​i​d​-​m​u​s​h​a​r​r​a​f​-​k​n​o​w​-​o​s​a​m​a​-hi…

Madhu, in my many discussions with ISI and the Pakistanis who know them, I’m always bemused with what an odd organization it is.

It’s fair to say that ISI not only had a team dedicated to hunting down bin Laden but also a cell devoted to protecting him. It’s hard for an outsider like me to make sense of this, other than to shrug and decide that it must befit the unique culture that created this sort of bureaucracy.

I never understand why we Americans think we can be “players” in that region. Our four year election cycles, institutional inertia, personal relationships between DC players and foreign influence agents, lobbyists, and officials. It’s complicated but we always think we can navigate complicated regional geopolitics. During the Cold War, Sovietology was a very serious endeavor. Now, we have an intellectual climate toward South and West Asia in our academic and DC institutions that is superficially and intellectually vacuous. But we are going to be players based on this faulty knowledge? Huh? Don’t get it. So many smart people, such strange choices.

Yeah, I think Mr. Chishti himself made that point about different cells and Mil control of the ISI and it not being a rogue institution.

I think he also said that the Pak Mil has done a good job of going after Al Q (we are paying a lot via our CIA liason relationship. It’s big time money. Pop off some Al Q guy, fund LeT, keep your eyes on the big prize next door to the East).

On the other hand, others say they are feeding us expendable guys and protecting assets they don’t want us to get.

Sort of like how some experts say that the Taliban can be peeled off from their Pakistani handlers versus those that say it won’t happen. I have been reading so much about this topic that I can tell you the US spin, the Pak spin, the India spin, the Afghan spin, the UK spin, the EU spin, etc. That’s why I’m so nutty on the subject :)

Er, I didn’t mean to imply that Mr. Chishti or you are giving me any spin, Carl. It’s just that I can recite the point of view of lots of different people on this subject. That’s why I’m all, disengage carefully, DISENGAGE CAREFULLY.

To paraphrase Churchill — democratic foreign policy is the worst foreign policy, save for all the others that we’ve tried.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement