Iraq: Mission Not-So-Accomplished

Iraq: Mission Not-So-Accomplished

“So tonight, I am announcing that the American combat mission in Iraq has ended. Operation Iraqi Freedom is over, and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country.“
– President Barack Obama, August 31, 2010


Back in 2003, a friend of mine, an unabashed liberal was grilling me about the wisdom of the impending invasion of Iraq. He was highly skeptical, and in fact believed the worst about the motives of the Bush Administration. He argued the coming war was ginned up on flimsy intelligence and would be a complete disaster. He wanted to know what I thought, as someone who covered the Pentagon and the debate about the war on a daily basis.

As a journalist, I avoided giving my opinion. In fact I wasn’t sure I had an opinion. One of the luxuries of being a reporter, who strives for objectivity, is that you don’t have to have an opinion. My job was to examine all sides of the issue, try to bring facts to bear on the debate, hold people accountable, and let the chips falls where they may. I didn’t need to decide if the invasion was the right thing to do. And honestly, I didn’t know.


My friend pressed me. I must have some opinions, he insisted. What did I think? When he would make his impassioned argument against the invasion, I would simply tell him what the senior leaders would offer as counterarguments, but I wouldn’t volunteer what I thought. That just frustrated him
Finally the week before the invasion, I allowed that if I had to get off the fence, I would come down on the side of believing the war was probably justified. I thought most Iraqis would welcome liberation but just couldn’t say it, and that Iraq, and the world, would be likely better off in the end.

But I did say I was wary about the intelligence, which I knew from long reporting experience is always imperfect. And I was also acutely aware of the unforeseen, unpredictable, and unintended consequences that can be set into motion once a war begins. I was just glad I wasn’t the president and I didn’t have to make such a weighty decision.

As for the weapons of mass destruction, I knew that many smart people in the Pentagon were honestly convinced they were there. I knew commanders who had access to intelligence I did not, and who were certain they would face, at the very least, poison gas on the battlefield.

And while I was wary about all the things that could go wrong, I also knew that sometimes — despite all the uncertainties of war — it’s not always mission impossible.  I remembered well all the dire predictions before NATO went to war over Kosovo in 1999. The standard military line was that the strategy was deeply flawed. You can’t bomb an enemy into submission. It would take substantial ground troops. And there would be heavy casualties. And afterward NATO forces would be subject to constant guerilla attacks, from snipers and rebel holdouts.

But the reality was, after 78 days, NATO DID win, without a single allied casualty. It was messy, and many civilians were killed. And the Chinese embassy was bombed by mistake. (Many n the region are still convinced that was deliberate.) But the alliance prevailed. It wasn’t “mission impossible” after all.
So flash forward to Iraq. It certainly seemed plausible back in 2002, that an invasion to topple Saddam Hussein might work. It certainly seemed Saddam was intent on acquiring WMDs even if he didn’t have them yet, he certainly acted as if he were hiding them. So when my friend pressed me, I conceded that I thought the war was justified, albeit with the same reservations many people had. I hoped for the best.
Now as the U.S. tries to tentatively declare victory and head home, I believe what I came to believe later in 2003, namely that Iraq will be better off in the end, will remain a mess for the foreseeable future. And the price the U.S. paid, in lives, in money, in national prestige is one we would not have paid had we known the cost going in.

So over the years I have seen smart people who were “wrong for the right reasons,” that is, they made reasonable decisions based on the best information available at the time, but were wrong in the end. And I’ve seen others who were “right for the wrong reasons,” meaning they jumped to conclusions based on incomplete, or even erroneous, information, but turned out to have jumped to the right conclusion.

And after all this, I have come to believe two things about the Iraq war right now: Iraq is not ready for U.S. troops to leave. And it is time for us to go.

Tags: , ,

Join the Conversation

Your two closings points are spot-on. I cringe when I read them, having been one of the outspoken skeptics like your “unabashed liberal friend.” I questioned the “General Powell Show” at the UN, with images of the “Mobile Chem/Bio labs,” places where not even the maddest of scientists would have dared to work. In truth, they proved to be hydrogen generators… designed to inflate Civil-War era observation balloons tethered to the ground by ropes. Still, today I feel no “I-told-you-so” bravado or boasts. I get positively sick to my stomach for the 4500+ dead Americans, a toll that includes three local boys. They weren’t even old enough to have seen the sales pitch that sent them to give their last full measure of devotion.

–Kyle York
Saratoga Springs

Got rid of a evil dictator that killed 1,000’s of innocent civilians — check
Gave Iraq back to the people — check
Removed the balance of power between Iraq and Iran, allowing Iran to become the regions super power and a threat to our allies in the region now — check
Turned the world against us after they were with us after 9–11, and made al-qaida look like they were telling the truth about big evil America wanting to invade their land and impose our views on them — check.

GEORGE W HAD TO GET SADDAM BECAUSE HIS DADDY DIDN‘T.I‘LL AGREE THE WORLD IS BETTER OFF WITHOUT SADDAM AND HIS SONS BUT LOOK AT THE AMERICAN LIVES IT COST.NOW WE ARE SUPPOSEDLY OUT,THE IRAQUIS ARE RIGHT BACK KILLING EACH OTHER,THAT IS WHAT THEY DO BEST​.IN THE MEAN TIME SUPERKARZAI HAS BEEN GETTING FATTER AND SASIER RIGHT STEADILY.SEEMS TO ME WE GAVE THE TALIBAN A 6 YEAR BREAK NOW WE ARE RECOMMITTED IT‘S TOO LATE TO CLEAN THEM OUT ALONG WITH ALQUEIDA AND A WHOLE LOT OF PAKISTANIS.

Part one of two:

I posted about the good deeds of: http://​www​.Bikefree​.org recently.

My request was that we all give one dollar, or 50 cents, or 25 cents to them.

If a large percentage of us just gave up the cost of a cup of coffee or a cold coke for the day then,

http://www.Bikefree would achieve their mission.

If those of you with school age children got their class mates involved; this too could make a positive impact for the children of our fallen troops. There are also great advantages to teaching our children out-reach. The act of helping others, especially children their age, builds character.

Part two of two:

You will see, on the http://​www​.Bikefree​.org web site that two young men put their jobs and family on hold to bike across America. Their goal is to raise funds for the children of our fallen.

Their mission is to deliver new bicycles to as many of these children as possible this Christmas.

From what I read, the private sector is standing behind their selfless act of compassion more than those who have been or are part of our military.

Come on people; stand tall, send a buck to http://​www​.Bikefree​.org

We could make a contest out of this. Will Navy give more than Army.…. or we could, as we have always done, leave it on the field. Your choice, I pick both.

Now, Jamie, back at home in real time…perhaps you can “get off the fence.…”

The war is STILL going on– we are STILL losing our men in Afganistan– Many US troops remain there and for what?? Why is no one talking about this????
the “mission is STILL NOT accomplished” or ALL of the US troops would be coming home.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement