The Midnight Ride of Barack Obama

The Midnight Ride of Barack Obama

President Barack Obama’s six-hour foray into Kabul — arriving at dusk and leaving before dawn — makes one wonder if he’s still in the dark about Afghanistan.

According to the press pool, Obama’s clandestine mission — conducted under cover of darkness because security is so dicey even in the Afghan capital — was to press President Hamid Karzai to get on the stick with needed reforms, so that all the sacrifice being made by U.S. and allied troops down in the south will pay off.

Mr. Obama was accompanied by his National Security Advisor Jim Jones who told reporters on Air Force One the President’s intent was to “engage President Karzai… to make him understand that in his second term, there are certain things that have been not paid attention to, almost since day one. That is things like…a merit-based system for appointment of key government officials, battling corruption, taking the fight to the narco-traffickers, which fuels, provides a lot of the economic engine for the insurgents.”


There are two problems here.

I accompanied with Gen. Jones when he traveled to Afghanistan in December of 2006, and sat in on a meeting to Karzai in which Jones basically told Karzai the exact same thing. That was back when Jones was Supreme NATO commander, and the problems in Afghanistan were exactly the same: namely the lack of any tradition of a strong central government, and any of the social institutions that go along with that.

Karzai seems like an earnest and well-meaning guy. But he was completely incapable then, and seems completely incapable now, of harnessing the political power would take to bring about those tremendous cultural and social changes. Frankly I’m not sure any Afghan leader could.


The linchpin of the surge strategy in Afghanistan is supposed to be protecting the people, not killing every last Taliban. And like the strategy in Iraq it hinges on Afghans taking over as soon as U.S.-led NATO forces pull back. Afghanification, if you will.

But unlike the Iraq surge, when President Bush boldly ordered more troops against the counsel of most of his advisers, Afghanistan is not at a tipping point. In Iraq, the surge served to help send a message at a critical time when Sunnis were turning on al Qaeda. Unfortunately, Afghanistan shows no sign of being near a tipping point.

Which brings up the other major problem that President Obama has created for himself. By announcing a target date to begin withdrawing U.S. forces of next summer, the president has boxed himself in. The clock is ticking. He has very little time to turn the situation around, hence the midnight ride to remonstrate Karzai.

While President Obama has ordered some 50,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan since he took office, most of the “surge troops” won’t be in place until this summer. 2011 will be here before you know it. That’s a very short time frame when you are trying to wage a successful counter-insurgency.

The question is, if another year passes, and Afghanistan is unable to step in to do the job now being done by Americans, will President Obama be forced to give up his withdrawal plans?

Photos of President Barack Obama in Kabul, Afghanistan, March 28, 2010 are all official White House Photos by Pete Souza.

Tags: , , ,

Join the Conversation

“when President Bush boldly ordered more troops against the advice of most of his advisors…” VOMITUS… Sen John McCain had been LOUDLY and PERSISTENTLY preaching that doctrine since 9/11/2001. Bush did it kicking and screaming. And he did it after we lost 4000 beautiful Americans and untold Iraqis. “Brave” my ass!!!! I’ve read few more revolting, twisted distortions of recent history than that one…

If the Commander in Chief is in the dark, this article sure didn’t shed any light. First you say there is no one who can unite the various factions, and that President Karzai is incapable. Then you go on to question whether we will be able to withdraw. With all due respect, sir, if the surge strategy isn’t going to work, and no one can unite the afghans, then why shouldn’t we get the hell out next year?
And there was nothing “Bold” about Bush’s surge, he had no choice since he disregarded Gen. Shalishkaveli’s advice to begin with, and went to war unprepared for the aftermath, and spent five years with an undermanned force. President Bush won’t go down in history as a tactical genius, thats for sure. And who’s fault is it that Afghanistan is not yet at the “tipping” point? We’ve been there for NINE years. We defeated the combined armies of Germany and Japan in four. This war and all it’s flaws stem from the previous administration, but thats an argument for another post.

Mission Accomplished!

What a load of crap.

Greg Wemhoff, USN (ret.)

Sneak in and out just like a thief in darkness, Oh well he comes by it naturally

What some fail to realize is that the withdrawal is conditions based.…the POTUS can and probably will change his mind over the course of a year.

The messaging is to Karzai and other leaders in Kabul.…

pummalo March 30th, 2010 at 1:00 pm — so what other POTUS has flown into Afghanistan at mid-day??

who are we to talk to them about government corruption? look at our government! our officials arent necessarily picked based on merit either. and we have plenty of drug smuggling and stuff here too. we need to fix our own problems if we ever want anyone to take us seriously

I’m sure that withdrawal time line was mainly intended for Karzai and his flunkies. Yes while he is an intelligent man he lacks the political savvy and might to accomplish what Pres Obama needs him to do. For a while our own Special forces were guarding him which should tell you about his Army and Police Force. We were training them back in 2002(I was there) and nothing has changed then from today. Soldiers need to believe in a positive end state to effectively accomplish the mission despite the 50,000 increase in troops. Yes our Soldiers will go into battle when ordered to do so, brave the cold and high mountainous elevations, isolated FOBs with little or no communications which get mortared and rocketed daily but I fear this is really a no win situation unless the Afghanistan people revolt against the Taliban. Surely they wont do this unless they have constant protection from Army and Police forces which are a joke to say the least.

Bolbi was right in his comments; The people that the president appointed to office in Washington are not knight in shining armor more like knights in rusty armor, then we have the gall to try and tell other countries they need to clean up their act. In this line of thought doesn’t make too much sense coming from out president when he can’t fill all the empty spots in his government due to the baggage they carry around with them. When we need to do is pull out and about two days after the last man/woman is withdrawn then drop an H bomb on the place and start all over again with a clean playing field

I agree with ranger-12 I mean look at our government they passed a health care bill that no one wanted. They add pet projects to other bills to add to the total of how much it will cost. and on top of that, they take back room deals from lobbyists, well that means they are corrupt, and on top of that they think they are doing a good job for America and want a 10% raise when most of America only gets about 2%, even the armed forces only get a 3.4% raise. so our government is corrupt and trying to turn us into a socialist country.

Karzai must have a warm feeling seeing how our other allies are being treated vice our enemies…oops, we don’t have enemies anymore, do we?

You can’t make this stuff up.
EVEN IFFFFFF Karzai has any skill for sarcasm,
his preaching to THIS Patriot doesn’t pass muster–

AFGHAN LEADER THREATENS TO JOIN TALIBAN

Monday April 5, 2010 @ 11:40 am EST

KABUL – Afghan President Hamid Karzai threatened over the weekend to quit the political process and join the Taliban if he continued to come under outside pressure to reform, several members of parliament said Monday.

Karzai made the unusual statement at a closed-door meeting Saturday with selected lawmakers — just days after kicking up a diplomatic controversy with remarks alleging foreigners were behind fraud in last year’s disputed elections.

“He said rebelling would change to resistance,” one senior lawmaker said — apparently suggesting that the militant movement would then be redefined as one of resistance against a foreign occupation rather than a rebellion against an elected government.

* * *

…and I thought we could never find a dolt dumb enough
to make our Saigon puppets look like Elder Statesmen…

–Kyle York
Saratoga Springs

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement