Pentagon Insecurity

Pentagon Insecurity

The recent shooting at the Pentagon shows that security improvements put in place since September 11 worked.  The gunman was stopped by the first line of defense: highly-trained police officers who can take cover behind bulletproof shields, and who check that everyone passing the initial checkpoint has a building pass, before they can proceed inside to swipe their electronic pass for entry.

Richard S. Keevill, chief of the force that guards the Pentagon said at a news conference after the shooting, “We train with some regularity to see we can do it very quickly, and we did it very quickly tonight.”

The two Pentagon Force Protection officers involved suffered only “grazing wounds,” while the suspect died from the return fire.  Pentagon Insecurity And the heavily guarded fortress was protected.  Job well done!


Not so fast. In the words of the classic informercal, “But wait, there’s more.”

The dirty little secret is that what saved the Pentagon from disaster was the fact the gunman was unaware of a gaping hole in Pentagon security, and therefore fortunately didn’t know how to exploit it.

Don’t worry, I’m not going to explain it here.   But trust me, as someone who has been in and out of the Pentagon thousands of times in the last two decades, I know where the shortfalls are, and there is a vulnerability that I pray will be addressed before something really bad happens.

All it would take is someone with intimate knowledge of how the security works, and the willingness to die in the attempt.  I think we know our enemies are more than willing to give their lives to kill Americans.

Some history.  Flash black to the innocent days of 1995.  The Oklahoma City bombing reveals the vulnerability of big buildings to truck bombs.   I look around the Pentagon where I work and I realize there is nothing to stop a similar attack here.  In fact my huge plate glass window looks right out on a likely target zone.   I raise the question, quietly with Pentagon officials.  I am assured there is no problem.  Security is fine, I am told.   I go outside and take pictures showing how a truck could easily drive around the security gates guarding the approaches to the Pentagon.  There is nothing but flat grass between the gates and the building.    I am told by officials that there are other defenses I am not aware of.  “Secret defenses” that would stop a vehicle before it got to the building.  This reminds me of the myth that there are surface to air anti-aircraft missiles on the roof to shoot down attacking planes.  No such missiles were deployed in the time I was there, and there were no secret defenses to protect against truck bombs.  It was all BS.

What there was, was a long-term plan to fortify the defenses over a several year period, but officials understandably didn’t want to telegraph to terrorists that the Pentagon would be vulnerable for the next five years, essentially saying “If you’re going to attack, better do it soon.”

I discussed with my bureau chief whether to do a report about the security shortcomings, with the idea it might put the improvements on the fast track. In the end we spiked the story, worrying it might give too many ideas to bad guys, before the deficiencies could be corrected.  So we held our breath, and hoped for the best.   And over the years, many enhancements were put in place.  By Sept 11, 2001, the building was far more secure, but not impregnable.

Then the plane hit, and security became an even bigger priority.  Additional checkpoints were set up, tighter procedures were put in place for issuing building passes and escorting visitors, an entire road was moved at enormous expenses so trucks would not pass too close to the building, and giant earth berms were erected.

The Pentagon is now one of the most heavily fortified buildings in the world.  But there is still a way past all this.   In the movies the bad guys always come in disguised as workers in coverall and crawl through the oversize ventilation shafts.  It’s always a fanciful depiction that is comforting in that it couldn’t happen that way in real life.

But at the Pentagon, there is still a way in that most Hollywood scriptwriters could figure out if they put their mind to it.  There could be a Ft. Hood-style shooting at the Pentagon.    Or even a breach like the insider attack on the CIA in Afghanistan.  And if Chief Richard Keevill wants to know how it could happen, and take steps to prevent it, I could let him in on the secret.

PLEASE– DO NOT POST YOUR THEORIES HERE.

Tags: , , ,

Join the Conversation

What you get to post your theories but we cannot? What fun is that?

I didn’t reveal my “theory” on the best way to defeat Pentagon defenses. I just didn’t want others to try to imagime what they are, and post various ways to get around security here!
Jamie

Good observations, and are widely discussed within the Pentagon community. Most of us who have traveled into and out of the Pentagon can imagine many ways to cause serious mayhem, few of which involve anything approaching “Mission Impossible.”

Nino; Why not have a badge, with photo that you put on to enter. Stand on a spot where an auto eye ‚shoots a beam to the badge, and verifies credentials.

You didn’t mention that the Pentagon renovation substantially strengthened the exterior walls of the Pentagon with things like layers of Kevlar and other protective techniques, and that all external windows are made of very effective blast-resistant glass. Even in the September 11 attack the newly reinforced walls and windows held up remarkably well.

If your fears are so great that you must write an article about it, try to get a job that will transfer you out of the Pentagon. Or at least try to get a job on the A ring of the second sub-basement.

You also forgot to mention that the Pentagon is virtually a city in itself. Approximately 23,000 employees, both military and civilian, work there around the clock. Then there are the thousands of people whose work location is elsewhere but who visit the Pentagon on business. All these people arrive daily from Washington, D.C. and its suburbs over approximately 30 miles of access highways, including express bus lanes and a subway. They ride past 200 acres of lawn to park approximately 8,770 cars in 16 parking lots. The Pentagon itself occupies 3,705,793 square feet of office space.

And you’re whining about security? I work in one of those buildings like the Murrow building in Oklahoma City. Complete with on-the-street parking out front and a loading dock.

And just remember all the troops you’re supporting troops that put their lives at risk every day. Possible lapses in Pentagon are a small price for you to pay for the honor of doing so.

You know? Everybody talks about security but when someone offers a suggestion, this is what happens. Don’t talk about it and don’t let anybody else know about it so that when the terrorists use it it becomes, now everybody must take off their shoes and be x-rayed now before they get on the airplane and the price for all this goes up astronomically. Ok, I’m gonna ask some questions. Has everybody seen how close and unrestricted the US-mail, Fed-ex and UPS mail vans can park next to the buildings? Do they even HAVE to park in the parking lot or can they park next to the building cause those mail bags are SOOOO heavy? Now, how much ‘Boom’ can a mail van carry and really does anyone actually look at the employees? NO? Why not? A matter of time gents. Oh yeah, when we were really threatened with extinction back in the 60s and 70s (nuclear arms race, H-bombs can kill millions you know) why did we not have this level of protection (HA!) that we have now? Lot more trust back then, now we have everybody DIS trusting everybody. Guess it’s a racket now and a good one too. “Hey, that guy over there wearing a hat, with a beard and glasses? He looks suspicious, like he’s trying to get a date. Officer? Arrest that man!” But a Rasta man with dread locks, shorts and t-shirt? It’s all good.

op sec should be done here . giving such information just aids our enemies. remember any fix site is a easy target and how much effort is done to protect it one can never! be competely safe.

The original post reminds me of a Capt who worked at CINCPAC during the Vietnam War. He would call us in Saigon and tell us that something really hot was going on but he couldn’t tell us what it was because it was classified. We all would laugh about it. We ended up referring to his calls as “Classified Ridiculous.”

Anyone who knows the first thing about security or tactical operations, knows that you can take out any target, if you are willing to pay the price. I have been in the P-gon a few times myself. It is obvious that they know some of their shortcomings. There are a lot of compensating measures available, such as random posting of guards at different locations, patrol routes change, time shifting for force buildup, response routes, etc. . In other words, security needs to be as unpredictable as possible.

Considering that nothing is 100% secure, the objective is to make it as secure as possible (90–95% range), mitigate the damage and have a good response plan, with a couple of alternatives. If you make it too secure, you will be unable to move the 23,000+ people in and out to get the job done.

Refering to the Oklahoma City and 9–11 attacks shouldn’t we just put gun mounts in upper floors of tall buildings and armor plated walls in building garages?

Subway

i think it was the gov.. it is impossiable to distroy the impossable

I think this world is too untrusting as that one guy said it wasn’t as bad befor no you have to like get undressed to get erayed to get on a plane on time i had to take off my shirt because they thought there was a gun in it but there wasn’t the september 11th think blows and so do the iraqians

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement